22/05/2024 |
Volkswagen AG v. Network System Technologies |
UPC_CoA_225/2023 |
App_28999/2024 |
ORD_29914/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
22/05/2024 |
Volkswagen AG v. Network System Technologies |
UPC_CoA_222/2024 |
App_28997/2024 |
ORD_29926/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
21/05/2024 |
SharkNinja Germany GmbH, SharkNinja Europe Limited v. Dyson Technology Limited |
|
ACT_589207/2023 |
ORD_598328/2023 |
Application for provisional measures |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
21/05/2024 |
Arm, Simulity Labs Limited, Apical Limited, SVF Holdco v ICPillar |
|
App_22767/2024 |
ORD_23494/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Local Division |
English |
|
1. If the application for provisional measures is filed within two months, it cannot normally be concluded that there has been an unreasonable delay in the case of an alleged infringement in two or more countries and in view of the necessary prior examination as to whether the defendants' embodiments actually make use of the teaching of the patent in suit and whether a legal action is also possible with any prospect of success, as well as in view of the corresponding serious preparation of the proceedings. 2. The principles laid down by the Court of Appeal in UPC_CoA_335/2023 must be applied when interpreting the patent or certain features of the patent claim. This applies equally to the assessment of infringement and to the assessment of the validity of a European Patent. The appropriate protection for the patentee and the associated sufficient legal certainty for third parties is largely determined by the wording chosen by the patentee in the light of the description and the drawings. As a result, the interpretation may lead to a broader or narrower understanding. 3. Due to the summary nature of the examination of legal validity in proceedings for the grant of provisional measures, it is not possible to carry out a full examination of all the attacks on validity as in nullity proceedings. Rather, the number of arguments raised against validity must generally be reduced to the best three from the defendant's point of view. 4. Unless the successful party puts forward important reasons (e.g. the risk of the other party's insolvency), there is no reason to order provisional reimbursement of costs in proceedings for interim measures where - as in this case - the summary proceedings must be followed by main proceedings. |
unreasonably delay, claim construction, Application for provisional measures, validity of the patent in suit |
|
16/05/2024 |
Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd., OROPE Germany GmbH v. Panasonic Holdings Corporation |
UPC_CFI_216/2023 |
App_4931/2024 |
ORD_6152/2024 |
Procedural Order |
Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
16/05/2024 |
STAUBLI TEC-SYSTEMS GMBH vs. Ralf Konrad, Hellmuth Konrad |
UPC_CFI_372/2023 |
ACT_580824/2024 |
ORD_29883/2023 |
Revocation Action |
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat |
German |
|
|
Erledigung; Verzicht auf das Patent; vorherige Verzichtsaufforderung; Kostengrundentscheidung |
|
15/05/2024 |
Kinexon Sports & Media GmbH, Kinexon GmbH, Union des Associations Européennes de Football (UEFA) |
|
App_23209/2024 |
ORD_23557/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Hamburg (DE) Local Division |
English |
|
|
|
|
14/05/2024 |
Dolby International AB v. Hewlett-Packard, HP |
UPC_CFI_457/2023 |
App_23193/2024 |
ORD_23441/2024 |
Amend Document |
Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
Richtet sich eine Klage zunächst gegen sämtliche, einer bestimmten Gattung zugehörigen Geräte des Beklagten und erklärt der Kläger sodann, dass bestimmte Geräte in einer spezifischen Konfiguration nicht von der Klage erfasst sein sollen, kann es sich dabei um eine nachträgliche bedingungslose Beschränkung des Klageanspruchs im Sinne von R. 263.3 VerfO handeln. |
Beschränkung des Klageanspruchs, Kosten, bedingungslose Beschränkung, Teilrücknahme |
|
14/05/2024 |
Oerlikon Textile GmbH & CO KG v. Bhagat Textile Engineers |
|
ORD_27218/2024 |
ORD_27218/2024 |
Generic Order |
Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Local Division |
Italian |
|
|
|
|
13/05/2024 |
Digital River Ireland, Ltd., Motorola Mobility Germany GmbH |
UPC_CFI_127/2024 |
App_26281/2024 |
ORD_26476/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
Antrag auf Verlängerung der Einspruchsfrist zur Angleichung der gegen verschiedene Beklagten laufenden Fristen. |
Angleichung, Fristverlängerungsantrag, Einspruch |
|
13/05/2024 |
SES-imagotag SA v. Hanshow Technology Co. Ltd, Hanshow France SAS, Hanshow Germany GmbH, Hanshow Netherlands B.V. |
UPC_CoA_1/2024 |
APL_8/2024 |
ORD_17447/2024 |
Appeal RoP220.1 |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
German |
|
|
|
|
10/05/2024 |
CEAD B.V., CEAD USA B.V. |
|
App_23523/2024 |
ORD_24708/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat |
German |
|
Anordnung der Simultanverdolmetschung, Art. 109 VerfO |
|
|
10/05/2024 |
Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., Tandem Diabetes Care Europe B.V. v. Roche Diabetes Care GmbH |
UPC_CFI_589997/2023 |
App_3514/2024 |
ORD_7903/2024 |
Preliminary objection |
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat |
English |
|
The violation of a standstill agreement does not constitute grounds for challenging the jurisdiction of the Unified Patent Court. |
standstill agreement, jurisdiction |
|
09/05/2024 |
TCT Mobile Europe SAS, TCL Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, TCL Operations Polska Sp. z.o.o, TCT Mobile Germany GmbH |
UPC_CFI_498/2023 |
App_26104/2024 |
ORD_26426/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
English |
|
Dealing with the situation where the claimant has submitted the wrong annexes to the statement of claim. |
wrong annexes, extension of time limits on request, amendment of the statement of claim |
|
08/05/2024 |
AUDI AG v. Network System Technologies LLC |
UPC_CFI_515/2023 |
App_11863/2024 |
ORD_26353/2024 |
|
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
English |
|
|
|
|
08/05/2024 |
AUDI AG |
UPC_CFI_514/2023 |
App_12109/2024 |
ORD_12235/2024 |
|
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
English |
|
|
|
|
08/05/2024 |
AUDI AG |
UPC_CFI_513/2023 |
App_12118/2024 |
ORD_12487/2024 |
|
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
English |
|
|
|
|
08/05/2024 |
AUDI AG |
UPC_CFI_514/2023 |
App_12109/2024 |
ORD_12235/2024 |
|
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
English |
|
|
|
|
08/05/2024 |
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd |
UPC_CFI_9/2023 |
App_22295/2024 |
ORD_22952/2024 |
|
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
06/05/2024 |
Bhagat Textile Engineers v. Oerlikon Textile GmbH & CO KG |
UPC_CFI_223/2025 |
App_21554/2024 |
ORD_23384/2024 |
Application RoP262A |
Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Local Division |
Italian |
|
|
|
|
06/05/2024 |
Panasonic Holdings Corporation v Xiaomi, Odiporo, Shamrock |
UPC_CFI_223/2023 |
ORD_25608/2024 |
ORD_25614/2024 |
Rule 264 Order |
Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
06/05/2024 |
Panasonic Holdings Corporation v Xiaomi, Odiporo, Shamrock |
UPC_CFI_223/2023 |
ORD_25608/2024 |
ORD_25608/2024 |
Rule 264 Order |
Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
06/05/2024 |
Panasonic Holdings Corporation v Xiaomi, Odiporo, Shamrock |
UPC_CFI_218/2023 |
ORD_25617/2024 |
ORD_25617/2024 |
Rule 264 Order |
Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
06/05/2024 |
Photon Wave, Seoul Viosys v Laser Components |
UPC_CFI_440/2023 |
ACT_588685/2023 |
ORD_18404/2024 |
Generic Order |
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Local Division |
French |
|
|
|
|
02/05/2024 |
Nokia Technology GmbH v. Mala Technologies Ltd. |
UPC_CFI-484/2023 |
App_8708/2024 |
ORD_13023/2024 |
Preliminary objection |
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat |
English |
|
|
lis pendens, Art 29-31 Brussels I Reg recast |
|