Moteur de recherchedans les décisionsde la Juridiction unifiée du brevet

Bienvenue dans ce moteur de recherche dans les décisions de la Juridiction unifiée du brevet (JUB)

À propos et fonctionnement

Cette base de données privée, maintenue par Pierre Véron, met gracieusement à votre disposition les décisions rendues publiques par la Juridiction unifiée du brevet depuis son entrée en activité le 1^er juin 2023 et un moteur de recherche pour les explorer.

Elle contient aussi des traductions automatiques en anglais (de courtoisie et sans garantie) des décisions qui n’ont pas été rendues en anglais (ainsi que quelques traductions automatiques en français).

Pour voir TOUTES les décisions disponibles, tapez une astérisque * dans la case Recherche globale.

Recherche par mots (“preuve”,“evidence” ou “beweis”) ou par expressions (“procédure accélérée”, “accelerated proceedings” ou “beschleunigtes verfahren”).

Utilisation possible des opérateurs booléens (en anglais et en majuscules) :

“test AND anticorps” , “test AND antibodies” ou “test AND antikörper”
“avocat OR représentant”, “lawyer OR representative” ou “anwalt OR vertreter”
“test AND NOT anticorps”, “test AND NOT antibodies” ou “test AND NOT antikörper”

Joker pour un caractère: ? Joker pour plusieurs caractères: *

Pour plus d’informations sur la syntaxe de recherche cliquez ici

Recherche globale

Recherche par champs

Date


et

Parties

Numéro de l'affaire

Numéro de la décision ou de l'ordonnance

Type d'action

Juridiction - Division

Langue de procédure

Sommaire

Mots clés

Langue du document

Nouvelle recherche

387 résultats trouvés

Date	Parties	Numéro de l'affaire	Numéro de la décision ou de l'ordonnance	Type d'action	Juridiction - Division	Langue de procédure	Sommaire	Mots clés	Documents
16/05/2024	Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd., OROPE Germany GmbH v. Panasonic Holdings Corporation	UPC_CFI_216/2023	ORD_6152/2024	Procedural Order	Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division	German			DE EN
15/05/2024	Kinexon Sports & Media GmbH, Kinexon GmbH, Union des Associations Européennes de Football (UEFA)		ORD_23557/2024	Generic application	Court of First Instance - Hamburg (DE) Local Division	English			EN
14/05/2024	Dolby International AB v. Hewlett-Packard, HP	UPC_CFI_457/2023	ORD_23441/2024	Amend Document	Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division	German	Richtet sich eine Klage zunächst gegen sämtliche, einer bestimmten Gattung zugehörigen Geräte des Beklagten und erklärt der Kläger sodann, dass bestimmte Geräte in einer spezifischen Konfiguration nicht von der Klage erfasst sein sollen, kann es sich dabei um eine nachträgliche bedingungslose Beschränkung des Klageanspruchs im Sinne von R. 263.3 VerfO handeln.	Beschränkung des Klageanspruchs, Kosten, bedingungslose Beschränkung, Teilrücknahme	DE EN
14/05/2024	Oerlikon Textile GmbH & CO KG v. Bhagat Textile Engineers		ORD_27218/2024	Generic Order	Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Local Division	Italian			IT EN
13/05/2024	Digital River Ireland, Ltd., Motorola Mobility Germany GmbH	UPC_CFI_127/2024	ORD_26476/2024	Generic application	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	German	Antrag auf Verlängerung der Einspruchsfrist zur Angleichung der gegen verschiedene Beklagten laufenden Fristen.	Angleichung, Fristverlängerungsantrag, Einspruch	DE EN
13/05/2024	SES-imagotag SA v. Hanshow Technology Co. Ltd, Hanshow France SAS, Hanshow Germany GmbH, Hanshow Netherlands B.V.	UPC_CoA_1/2024	ORD_17447/2024	Appeal RoP220.1	Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU)	German			DE EN
10/05/2024	CEAD B.V., CEAD USA B.V.		ORD_24708/2024	Generic application	Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat	German	Anordnung der Simultanverdolmetschung, Art. 109 VerfO		DE EN
10/05/2024	Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., Tandem Diabetes Care Europe B.V. v. Roche Diabetes Care GmbH	UPC_CFI_589997/2023	ORD_7903/2024	Preliminary objection	Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat	English	The violation of a standstill agreement does not constitute grounds for challenging the jurisdiction of the Unified Patent Court.	standstill agreement, jurisdiction	EN
09/05/2024	TCT Mobile Europe SAS, TCL Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, TCL Operations Polska Sp. z.o.o, TCT Mobile Germany GmbH	UPC_CFI_498/2023	ORD_26426/2024	Generic application	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	English	Dealing with the situation where the claimant has submitted the wrong annexes to the statement of claim.	wrong annexes, extension of time limits on request, amendment of the statement of claim	EN
08/05/2024	Volkswagen AG v. Network System Technologies LLC	UPC_CFI_514/2023	ORD_26350/2024	Preliminary objection	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	English	preliminary objection rule 19 RoP, request rule 361 RoP, withdrawal of opt out rule 5 RoP, infringement read	withdrawal of opt out rule 5, preliminary objection rule 19 RoP, infringement read, request rule 361 RoP	EN
08/05/2024	Network System Technologies LLC v. Texas Instruments Incorporated, Texas Instruments Deutschland GmbH	UPC_CFI_515/2023	ORD_26347/2024		Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	English			EN
08/05/2024	Volkswagen AG v. Network System Technologies LLC	UPC_CFI_514/2023	ORD_26336/2024		Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	English			EN
08/05/2024	AUDI AG	UPC_CFI_513/2023	ORD_12487/2024		Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	English			EN
08/05/2024	Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd	UPC_CFI_9/2023	ORD_22952/2024		Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	English			EN
06/05/2024	Panasonic Holdings Corporation v Xiaomi, Odiporo, Shamrock	UPC_CFI_223/2023	ORD_25614/2024	Rule 264 Order	Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division	German			DE EN
06/05/2024	Panasonic Holdings Corporation v Xiaomi, Odiporo, Shamrock	UPC_CFI_223/2023	ORD_25608/2024	Rule 264 Order	Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division	German			DE EN
06/05/2024	Panasonic Holdings Corporation v Xiaomi, Odiporo, Shamrock	UPC_CFI_218/2023	ORD_25617/2024	Rule 264 Order	Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division	German			DE EN
06/05/2024	Photon Wave, Seoul Viosys v Laser Components	UPC_CFI_440/2023	ORD_18404/2024	Generic Order	Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Local Division	Français			FR EN
06/05/2024	Bhagat Textile Engineers v. Oerlikon Textile GmbH & CO KG	UPC_CFI_223/2025	ORD_23384/2024	Application RoP262A	Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Local Division	Italian			IT EN
02/05/2024	Nokia Technology GmbH v. Mala Technologies Ltd.	UPC_CFI-484/2023	ORD_13023/2024	Preliminary objection	Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Local Division	English		lis pendens, Art 29-31 Brussels I Reg recast	EN
02/05/2024	PROGRESS MASCHINEN & AUTOMATION AG v. AWM, Schnell	UPC_CoA_177/2024	APL_20002/2024	Generic application	Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU)	English			EN
01/05/2024	Keestrack N.V. v. Geha Laverman B.V.	UPC_CFI_379/2023	ACT_ 581723/2023	Generic application	Court of First Instance - The Hague (NL) Local Division	Dutch	Beslissing tot beëindiging van de inbreukprocedure na intrekkingsverzoek van eiser. Restitutie bevel. R.265.2 en R. 370.9 en 11 RoP	R.265 en R.370.9 en 11 RoP	NL EN
01/05/2024	Daedalus Prime LLC vs. Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd., Xiaomi Inc., Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V., Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH, MediaTek Inc.	UPC_CoA_183/2024	ORD_24731/2024		Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU)	English			EN
30/04/2024	Curio Bioscience Inc. v. 10x Genomics, Inc.	UPC_CFI_463/2023	ORD_23580/2024	Generic Order	Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division	German	1. If in the case of a European patent a person is registered as the patent proprietor in the respective national register, there is a rebuttable presumption that the person recorded in the respective national register is entitled to be registered (R. 8.5(c) RoP). The result of such a legal presumption is to reverse the burden of explanation and proof with regard to the presumed fact. If the Applicant can refer to his listing in the registers relevant to the respective dispute, it is up to the Defendant's side to set out and, if necessary, prove that the Applicant is not entitled to be registered. 2. If a patent claim contains stated purposes, these usually serve to improve understanding of the invention. As a rule, they have the indirect effect of defining the subject matter protected by the patent in such a way that it must not only fulfil the spatial-physical features, but must also be designed to be usable for the purpose stated in the patent claim. 3. If the Applicant lacks positive knowledge of an infringement of property rights, grossly negligent ignorance or wilful blindness to an infringement of intellectual property rights is considered equivalent to such knowledge. The patent proprietor is not under a general obligation to observe the market. However, as soon as the holder of a property right becomes aware of specific circumstances that suggest an infringement of his property right, he is expected to take all measures readily available to him and to further clarify the circumstances. It is up to the Defendant to explain such circumstances triggering a duty to provide information. 4. While Art. 69(4) EPC only provides for the provision of security for costs by the claimant, R. 158 RoP extends the group of addressees of such an Order to include "the Parties" and thus also the Defendant in the main action. In urgent proceedings, there is neither scope nor (with regard to R. 211.1(d) RoP) a need for the (analogous) application of the provision, given the urgent nature of such proceedings.	stated purpose, security for costs, urgency, knowledge of infringement, Right to bring an action, negligent ignorance, weigh-up of interests, presumption, register	DE EN
30/04/2024	Panasonic Holdings Corporation v Xiaomi, Odiporo, Shamrock	UPC_CFI_218/2023	ORD_14581/2024	Generic application	Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division	German			DE EN

1 ... 6 7 8 ... 16